Original, independent, thought leadership
U.S. Capitol - Voting Rights and Election Security - Washington D.C.

Can the U.S. Antitrust Laws Stop ESG investing?

Opinion:  ESG is gaining traction as a political issue and in the process, arguments have surfaced that ESG initiatives may be subject to anti-competitive practices.

Home » Trends » Opinion Briefs » Can the U.S. Antitrust Laws Stop ESG investing?

Share This Article:

Opinion:  ESG is gaining traction as a political issue and in the process, arguments have surfaced that ESG initiatives may be subject to anti-competitive practices.

The politicization of ESG investing is introducing additional business uncertainties and risks with financial consequences, including potential legal liabilities and reputational issues
ESG investing is gaining traction as a political issue and in the process, arguments have been raised that ESG initiatives may be subject to anti-competitive practices.  For ESG investors, this development is introducing additional business uncertainties and risks with financial consequences, including potential legal liabilities and reputational issues for assets managers and other financial institutions that must be negotiated with caution.   Just about three weeks ago, Vanguard announced that it was pulling out of the Net Zero Asset Managers (NZAM) initiative, a major investment-industry initiative with 291 signatories representing some $66 trillion in assets under management focused on tackling climate change.  This action, which by Vanguard’s account will not affect its “commitment to helping our investors navigate the risks that climate change can pose to their long-term returns,” may be linked to the politicization of ESG investing.

For over 100 years, the U.S. antitrust laws have operated with the basic objective to protect the competition process for the benefit of consumers, making sure there are strong incentives for businesses to operate efficiently, keep prices down, and keep quality up.  So, what do the antitrust laws have to do with ESG investing?  Everything.

In the aftermath of COP27, corporations that decide to decarbonize and agree to a set of standards may have to undertake some costly investments to implement these initiatives.  While these actions may be socially admirable and long-term fiscally sound, they may also lead to short-term higher prices or lower margins, and this is where the antitrust laws come in.  If one corporation tries to pass these higher prices on to its customers, it may find itself at a competitive disadvantage.  If a group of companies, that represent more than 20% of the market shares, decide to collaborate around a common theme, like decarbonization, and then pass along these short-term additional costs to its customers, it may have opened itself up to a violation of the U.S. antitrust laws.  If found guilty of these charges, the costs are high.  The Sherman Act imposes criminal penalties of up to $100 million for a corporation and $1 million for an individual, along with up to 10 years in prison.  Under federal law, the maximum fine may be increased to twice the amount the conspirators gained from the illegal acts or twice the money lost by the victims of the crime, if either of those amounts is over $100 million.

The language around the antitrust laws is clear and strong.  That is why car manufacturers, insurers, individual states, and even the United Nations have amended their language around fossil fuel reduction projects, due to antitrust concerns.  In September of this year, the US Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Competition Policy, Antitrust, and Consumer Rights held a hearing on “Oversight of Federal Enforcement of the Antitrust Laws.”  At this hearing, the antitrust implications of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives were discussed.  As the chart below indicates, the anti-ESG movement has become a political issue.

There is currently a need for the U.S. antitrust laws to reflect a balance between the short-term and long-term protection of consumers.   Of course, price gouging and manipulation through “greenwashing” campaigns must be vigorously prosecuted but the law must also take into consideration the long-term protection of the consumer.  We believe there needs to be a tradeoff between the significant issues of public benefit (i.e., greenhouse gas emissions) and the private costs to consumers.

Other countries are also grappling with some of these same issues.  For example, in the UK, the Competition and Markets Authority has recently established a “sustainability taskforce” to prepare new guidance and consider the case for changes in its law[i].   With the recent passage of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), it is likely that American firms will need to collaborate more, not less, in the future and the antitrust law will be front and center.

[i] https://www.gov.uk/government/news/cma-publishes-environmental-sustainability-advice-to-government

Author:  Michael Cosack
December 29, 2022

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
$99.99
PER YEAR

Premium Articles Access Priority Support 1 Fixed Price

Free Trial
30 Day

Access to All Data No Credit Card Required Cancel Any Time

9.99
Monthly

Access to Premium Articles Priority Support Save 25%


Sign up to free newsletters.


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: . You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

Research

Research and analysis to keep sustainable investors up to-date on a broad range of topics that include trends and developments in sustainable investing and sustainable finance, regulatory updates, performance results and considerations, investing through index funds and actively managed portfolios, asset allocation updates, expenses, ESG ratings and data, company and product news, green, social and sustainable bonds, green bond funds as well as reporting and disclosure practices, to name just a few.

A continuously updated Funds Directory is also available to investors.  This is intended to become a comprehensive listing of sustainable mutual funds, ETFs and other investment products along with a description of their sustainable investing approaches as set out in fund prospectuses and related regulatory filings.

Getting started

Many questions have surfaced in recent years regarding sustainable and ESG investing.  Here, investors and financial intermediaries will find materials that describe the various approaches to sustainable investing and their implementation.  While sustainable investing approaches vary and they have thus far defied universally accepted definitions, many practitioners agree that they fall into the following broad categories:  Values-based investing, investing via exclusions, impact investing, thematic investments and ESG integration.  In conjunction with each of these approaches, investors may also adopt various issuer engagement procedures and proxy voting practices.  That said, sustainable investing approaches will continue to evolve.

In addition to periodic updates regarding sustainable investing and how this form of investing is evolving, investors and financial intermediaries interested in implementing a sustainable investing approach will also find source materials that cover basic investing themes as well as asset allocation tactics.

Inesting ideas

Thoughts and ideas targeting sustainable investing strategies executed through various registered and non-registered sustainable investment funds and products such as mutual funds, Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), Exchange Traded Notes (ETNs), closed-end funds, Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and Unit Investment Trusts (UITs). Coverage extends to investment management firms as well as fund groups. 

Independent source for sustainable investment management company research, analysis, opinions and sustainable fund disclosure assessments