Original, independent, thought leadership
Stock market exchange loss trading graph analysis investment indicator business graph charts of financial board display candlestick crisis stock crash red price chart fall money

Six ETFs launched in June 2021, but investors are guided to consider alternatives

The Bottom Line: The funds lack an established track record, are generally offered at higher expense ratios and their sustainable investing strategies¹ are not unique.

Share This Article:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

The Bottom Line: The funds lack an established track record, are generally offered at higher expense ratios and their sustainable investing strategies¹ are not unique.

Investor considerations

Newly launched in June 2021, the six new EFTs are still small in size, they lack an established track record and, with the exception of two ETFs, their expense ratios exceed the lowest quartile. When combined with the fact that these funds don’t offer sufficiently unique or differentiated fundamental or sustainable investing strategies relative to currently available offerings, investors, at this time, would be better guided to seek out more attractive alternatives from the existing universe of sustainable ETFs or mutual funds.

Observations

  • Six new sustainable ETFs were launched in the month of June 2021, the largest number of sustainable ETF launches in one month so far this year. 14 ETFs in total were launched in Q2 and eight were introduced in Q1.
  • Five of these are actively managed ETFs while five of the six funds are equity-oriented; in total, the six funds came to market with $32.8 million in net assets. Of the five actively managed funds three ETFs are non-transparent, that is, they publish a daily “tracking basket” of securities held rather than their entire portfolio of securities holdings. (Designated by the # symbol in Table 1).
  • The six ETFs levy an average expense ratio of 59 bps, ranging 39 bps to 99 bps; the first quartile cut-off is at 39 bps, representing the upward limit of the lowest fee ETFs across the six new offerings in June. This is higher than the first quartile cut-off of 20 bps across the entire universe of sustainable ETFs—146 funds in total.
  • Sustainable investing strategies offered by these funds have adopted ESG integration or thematic investing approaches. The latter don’t qualify securities on the basis of an ESG evaluation. The sustainable investing approaches are described in Table 1.
Table 1: Listing of ETFs launched in June 2021 and their sustainable investing strategies
Fund Name Investment Adviser/Sub-adviser TNA ($M) Expense Ratio (bps) Sustainable Investing Strategy/Approach
American Century Sustainable Growth ETF# (actively managed) American Century Investment Management, Inc. 5.2 39 ESG integration.  Quantitative analysis of ESG factors to arrive at sector specific ESG scores.  Holdings include securities that fall within the top three quartiles relative to the Russell 1000 Growth Index.
Amplify Cleaner Living ETF Amplify Investments LLC, investment adviser Penserra Capital Management LLC, subadvisor 1.3 59 Thematic.  An index fund that seeks to replicate the performance of the Tematica BITA Cleaner Living Index, an index designed to measure the market performance of a basket of publicly listed companies that are identified as creating products or providing services that have the potential for a positive impact on the human body and/or the environment.  Securities not subject to ESG evaluations.
Asian Growth Cubs ETF (actively managed) Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC,  investment adviser and Kingsway Capital Partners Limited, subadvisor 2.3 99 ESG Integration, including the exclusion from the portfolio of certain industries and sub-industries relating to defense, fossil fuels, gambling, mining, and tobacco due to ESG considerations.
Fidelity® Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF# (actively managed) FMR 2 59 ESG Integration.  Process relies on FMR’s proprietary ESG ratings process to evaluate the current state of a company’s sustainability practices using a data-driven framework that includes both proprietary and third party data, and also provide a qualitative forward looking assessment of a company’s sustainability outlook.
Fidelity® Women’s Leadership ETF# (actively managed) FMR 2 59 Thematic, but securities are not subject to ESG evaluations.
IQ Mackay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF (actively managed) IndexIQ Advisors LLC, investment advisor and MacKay Shields LLC, subadvisor 20 39 ESG Integration.  A systematic ESG evaluation approach that scores companies on the basis of three tiers relative to other issuers within the peer group:  Outperforming, average and underperforming.  Only issuers that fall into the top two tier + companies with improving ESG trends.  Also, the fund excludes certain issuers and it also explicitly practices issuer engagements, described below.
Notes of Explanation: # non-transparent ETFs. Sources: TNA and expense ratios: Morningstar Direct, Sustainable investing strategies: Fund prospectus and Sustainable Research and Analysis

IQ Mackay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF (Cont.).  The fund will also not invest in securities of corporate issuers that derive greater than 5% of their revenue from the production, distribution, and services of coal, manufacturing of military equipment, alcoholic beverages, and tobacco products, operation of gambling casinos, and the production or trade of pornographic materials. The fund will also not invest in the securities of corporate issuers determined to not meet human rights, labor standards, environmental, and anti-corruption screening criteria. The subadvisor is also involved in engagement activities focused on understanding an issuer’s sustainability goals and business practices as well as other industry participants engaged in ESG and sustainability initiatives. Engagement is intended to better align mutual interests while impacting change.

¹ Note of Explanation: While definitions continue to evolve, sustainable investing refers to a range of five overarching investing approaches or strategies that encompass: values-based investing, negative screening (exclusions), thematic investing, impact investing and ESG integration, in turn, classified into ESG Integration, ESG Integration-Consideration and ESG Integration-Mixed, referring to a core strategy consisting of ESG integration, but exclusions, impact or thematic approaches may also be employed. Shareholder/bondholder engagement and proxy voting may also be employed along with one of more of these strategies that are not mutually exclusive. As defined for purposes of this article, thematic investing refers to an approach that align a fund’s investments with a predetermined ESG investment theme according to established criteria. For example, the Fidelity Women’s Leadership ETF normally invests in equity securities of companies that prioritize and advance women’s leadership and development. Such companies include those that, at the time of initial purchase, (i) include a woman as a member of the senior management team, (ii) are governed by a board for which women represent at least one third of all directors, or (iii) in the FMR’s opinion, have adopted policies designed to attract, retain and promote women. At the same time, broader ESG factors are not explicitly taken into consideration in stock selection.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE


Sign up to free newsletters.


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: . You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

Research

Research and analysis to keep sustainable investors up to-date on a broad range of topics that include trends and developments in sustainable investing and sustainable finance, regulatory updates, performance results and considerations, investing through index funds and actively managed portfolios, asset allocation updates, expenses, ESG ratings and data, company and product news, green, social and sustainable bonds, green bond funds as well as reporting and disclosure practices, to name just a few.

A continuously updated Funds Directory is also available to investors.  This is intended to become a comprehensive listing of sustainable mutual funds, ETFs and other investment products along with a description of their sustainable investing approaches as set out in fund prospectuses and related regulatory filings.

Getting started

Many questions have surfaced in recent years regarding sustainable and ESG investing.  Here, investors and financial intermediaries will find materials that describe the various approaches to sustainable investing and their implementation.  While sustainable investing approaches vary and they have thus far defied universally accepted definitions, many practitioners agree that they fall into the following broad categories:  Values-based investing, investing via exclusions, impact investing, thematic investments and ESG integration.  In conjunction with each of these approaches, investors may also adopt various issuer engagement procedures and proxy voting practices.  That said, sustainable investing approaches will continue to evolve.

In addition to periodic updates regarding sustainable investing and how this form of investing is evolving, investors and financial intermediaries interested in implementing a sustainable investing approach will also find source materials that cover basic investing themes as well as asset allocation tactics.

Inesting ideas

Thoughts and ideas targeting sustainable investing strategies executed through various registered and non-registered sustainable investment funds and products such as mutual funds, Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), Exchange Traded Notes (ETNs), closed-end funds, Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and Unit Investment Trusts (UITs). Coverage extends to investment management firms as well as fund groups. 

Independent source for sustainable investment management company research, analysis, opinions and sustainable fund disclosure assessments